Sam's Subaru STI |
![]() |
The car I tried to build, but ended up buying: |
When I bought my 1999
2.5RS, the US-Spec STI did not exist yet; for Subaru enthusiasts,
performance meant buying either the RS or the WRX, and modifying it. At that
time RSes with aftermarket kits were blowing up on a regular basis while
making mediocre power (250ish hp) and WRXes weren't doing much better, also
experiencing their fair share of failures while the fine nuances of engine
management were figured out by tuners only now recently presented with the
platform.Mine was one of the earlier swaps in the USA, and it also helped popularize this activity, as it was so widely publicized on Internet forums and online on this page. As such, I was very proud of it. Still, it had its shortcomings... Namely, since swapping in my first motor at 80000miles, I had managed to break a halfshaft, 2 transmissions, a turbo,2 wheel bearings, blow 4 struts, ruin 2 power steering pumps and blow 3 motors. In short, my RS was driving me deep into debt because it seemed to spend more time in the garage seeing expensive repairs than on the road, doing what it was supposed to do. The number one question I always got about my RS from the non enthusiast crowd always was: "Why didn't you just buy an STI instead?". My answer was very simple: Because my RS was a lot lighter (by almost 500 lbs) and made quite a bit more power (around 50hp more) than an STI. Plus I liked its looks better. Still, with all these failures, I too started to wonder why I wasn't just driving the car my RS was supposed to be; it would be cheaper, after all. The final decision came when my transmission broke for the 2nd time. It happened after a string of failures (clutch first, then power steering, and now that), took a month to repair and cost me over a thousand dollars. I put the car up for sale and the interest was enormous. Immediately I had people from all over the country interested in buying it. I sold it at a big loss, like any other highly modded car, and moved on. I actually used my credit card to buy the STI, then paid most of it off with the money from the sale of the RS, and the rest over a much longer time. |
|
|
The Goal: |
|
For me the STI 6 speed transmission, and all the uprated components that came with it (thicker halfshafts, stronger gears, larger differentials) alone was worth the cost of the STI. But it also had a MUCH better interior than my RS, much better seats, HID headlights with a dash mounted leveling switch, and massive Brembo brakes. In short, the STI was the complete package; power, handling, speed, comfort. It was the car I had always tried to build. And this time it would be reliable, because it was stock. |
The Car: |
The very first time I drove an STI was after I had already bought one and
paid for it. I got on the car, let it warm up, and went full throttle. My
first thought was: "Wow, this really isn't very fast". That thought stayed
with me modification after modification, and was always a little bit of a
let down; at 3300 lbs and with a stock turbo, there was no way that the STI
could compete with the incredibe power-weight ratio of my swapped RS, no
matter how I tuned it. |
The Engine |
![]() The engine on all US-Spec STIs is termed "EJ257". Unlike the 2.0L EJ207 from Japan, it displaces 2.5L, presumably in order to make equivalent power with the inferior fuels available here. On paper, the bigger engine looks great: More power and torque prior to the turbo spooling up, and more power and torque at any given boost level once the turbo does spool up. This engine also incorporates AVCS (Advanced Valve Control System); a system that retards camshaft timing on the intake side to further reduce turbo lag, then advances it for optimal power on boost. The same system keeps cam timing fully retarded on cruise, so as to reduce pumping losses and net better fuel economy. In practice, the engine had two major letdowns for me: First of all while it may in fact have spooled up faster, it never felt that way because the car was so heavy. Secondly, it redlined at only 7000RPM, and started to lose power well before that. The low redline coupled with short gearing made for a lot of shifting, but not a whole lot of acceleration. Sure, to put it in perspective, on a typical day this will still be one of the fastest vehicles on the road, and on a rainy day it most often is the fastest and most capable vehicle on the road. But I was used to more, and I wanted more. Much more. Exhaust:
Headers:
1- The same larger pipe diameter that allows more horsepower at the top end through lower restriction also causes increased lag, as the exhaust gases have a larger space to fill before reaching the turbine and ding work to it. 2- The factory headers are thick and made of cast iron; they retain
heat a lot better than the thin wall stainless steel aftermarket headers
are made of; because of that, they allow the gases to cool down before
reaching the turbo. As gases cool down, they contract, causing a further
increase in turbo lag. Coupled with the fact that all that heat loss rises
up and heat soaks the intercooler, I would recommend never running
uninsulated headers on a turbo car. I had these out for ceramic coating
after only driving with them for a month. Once removed, I also noticed
that their equal length design made the car lose a lot of its
characteristic "Boxer Burble" exhaust note.
Catback Exhaust:
Intercooler: In a turbo car, intake air teperature is everything: on boost, you will make as much power as you can intercool into your engine.
|
|
|
Brakes, Tires and Traction: |
![]() ![]()
|
Interior: |
![]()
Pillar: Boost and Air/Fuel Ratio
|
Under Construction! |
Under Construction! |
Under Construction! |
|
|
Under Construction! |
|
The new car |
|
Comments? Mail me. Last updated 11/02/10 |
|
Copyright
� 2002 -2003 by Sam Barros. All rights reserved. Removing any material from this site for display without consent from its author consists in an infringement of international copyright laws and can result in fines up to $50000 per infringement, plus legal costs. |